Who pays realtor fees used to be a question with one answer, and nobody questioned it: the seller paid, out of the proceeds, and the listing agent split the money with whoever brought the buyer. Since the middle of 2024 that arrangement has been unbundled, and the honest answer to who pays is now it depends, and you should negotiate. This page puts real numbers on the difference. On a $300,000 house, the fee structure alone is worth about $3,942 to a seller, which turns out to be roughly two thirds the size of the entire discount a cash buyer would ask for.

Send the address. We will tell you what we would pay, and whether we think listing beats it.
Takes about two minutes. Or call (313) 710-6129 — we answer.
Educational only. This explains how these situations generally work. It is not legal, tax or financial advice, and the rules differ by state — talk to an attorney or CPA about your own situation before you act on any of it.
The seller still pays the listing agent from the sale proceeds. Since 2024 the buyer's agent fee is separately negotiated, and it can be paid by the buyer, by the seller as a concession, or split. Commission rates are not set by law and never have been.
General information, not legal advice. Practices vary by state and brokerage. Your state real estate commission publishes consumer guidance on what agents must disclose to you.
Two practical changes took effect across most of the country in August 2024, and both changed who pays realtor fees on an ordinary sale.
First, offers of buyer-agent compensation can no longer be advertised on the MLS. Previously a listing broadcast to every buyer's agent exactly what they would be paid for bringing a buyer, and that number was effectively standardized in each market. Now it is not published there, so it has to be negotiated deal by deal.
Second, buyers working with an agent must sign a written representation agreement before touring homes, and that agreement states what their agent will be paid. This is why buyers now arrive at the negotiating table with a fee obligation of their own, and frequently ask the seller to cover it as a closing concession.
What did not change is more important than what did. Commission rates were always negotiable. They are not fixed by statute, they are not a legal requirement, and any agreement between competitors to set them would run into ordinary antitrust law. The going rate in a market was a convention, not a rule. The change in 2024 mostly made that fact impossible to ignore.
Your state regulator is the authority on what your agent owes you here — the Texas Real Estate Commission and the Ohio Division of Real Estate are examples of the bodies that publish plain-language consumer guidance and take complaints.
Asking who pays realtor fees is only half of it. The other half is how much, and percentages are hard to feel in a way dollars are not.
| Structure | Total commission | Versus 6% |
|---|---|---|
| 6% covering both sides (the old default) | $18,000 | — |
| 5.5% covering both sides | $16,500 | $1,500 better |
| 5% covering both sides | $15,000 | $3,000 better |
| 2.5% listing side only | $7,500 | $10,500 better |
| Flat-fee listing | ~$3,500 | $14,500 better |
That bottom row is not free money and you should be suspicious of anyone who presents it that way. A flat-fee listing typically buys you MLS entry and little else: you handle showings, negotiation, disclosures and the path to closing yourself. For an experienced seller with a house that shows well, that can be an excellent trade. For someone selling an inherited house from three states away, it usually is not.
And the 2.5% row hides the real question. If you are not paying the buyer's agent, somebody is — and that somebody is bidding on your house with less money available.
This is the part that gets glossed over in almost everything written about the 2024 changes, and it is the difference between a useful expectation and a disappointment.
A buyer who must pay their own agent 2.5% out of pocket has that much less to put into the price, and they know it when they write the offer. So the fee does not vanish when it moves off your side of the settlement statement. Part of it comes back at you as a lower bid.
How much comes back depends on the market. In a market with more buyers than houses, sellers keep most of the saving. In a slow market, buyers push most of it back. A reasonable middle assumption — and the one used below — is that a buyer funding their own agent bids about 1.5% less on a house they would otherwise have paid full price for.
So on a house that would have sold for $300,000 with the seller covering both sides, the same buyer paying their own agent bids around $295,500. You save $9,113 of commission and give back $4,500 in price. You are still ahead, but by roughly half of what the headline suggests. Anyone promising you the full 2.5% is selling something.
Here is the same house all the way to net proceeds. Worth $300,000 repaired, needing $18,000 of work, carrying about $1,450 a month.

| Route | Gross | Costs | Net | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repair, list at 2.5% listing side only | $295,500 | $18,000 repairs, $7,388 commission, $3,546 closing, $3,000 concession, $6,525 holding | $257,042 | ~4.5 months |
| Repair, list at 5.5% covering both sides | $300,000 | $18,000 repairs, $16,500 commission, $3,600 closing, $3,000 concession, $5,800 holding | $253,100 | ~4 months |
| Sell as-is for cash | $252,000 | $1,015 holding | $250,985 | 2 to 3 weeks |
Three things fall out of this table, and the first two are inconvenient for us.
One: listing wins. On a $300,000 house that needs only $18,000 of work and can be shown, the best listing route nets $6,056 more than our cash offer. If you have the money for repairs and four months to spare, list it. That is the honest answer and it is the answer for most houses in this condition.
Two: the fee structure is worth $3,942 — the gap between the two listing rows. That is about 65% of the entire cash discount, earned by a conversation with your agent before you sign the listing agreement. Sellers spend weeks agonising over whether to take a cash offer and about four minutes on the commission line. The four minutes are worth more per minute.
Three: the gap is smaller than the percentages imply. A cash offer at $252,000 sounds like 16% below value. After $18,000 of repairs, $7,388 to $16,500 of commission, closing costs, a concession and months of carrying costs, the actual difference in what reaches your bank account is 2% to 2.4% of the house. That is the number to decide on. See cash offer vs listing net proceeds for the same comparison run several ways.
Who pays realtor fees is the biggest question on the settlement statement but not the only one, and sellers routinely forget the rest when comparing offers.
The document that lays all of this out is the closing disclosure, and the CFPB publishes a plain-language walkthrough of it. The federal rules governing settlement statements sit in Regulation X if you want the source.
The comparison on this page only works if you have a real as-is number to put next to the net sheet. We will give you one in writing, at no cost, with no obligation and no follow-up pressure.
And interview three agents anyway. On the example above, the best listing route beat us by $6,056 — we would rather you knew that than found out later. Send us the property here.
All guides · Seller closing costs explained · Cash offer vs listing net proceeds · How cash buyers calculate offers
No obligation, no fees, no repairs. We respond the same day.
Takes about two minutes. Or call (313) 710-6129 — we answer.
Restar Acquisitions is the acquisitions arm of Restar — a housing-market analytics platform tracking 180+ metrics across every U.S. market, with composite scores and 12-month price forecasts. The numbers on this page come from the same work.